Rumor – Artemis II mission photos show the far side of the Moon with a bizarre shape and Earth visibly more polluted after 50 years.
Analysis
The progress of recent space missions has brought not only scientific advances but also a constant flow of interpretations and viral content on social media. Recently, with the monitoring of the Artemis II mission, which aims to orbit the Moon, several images began to circulate with impressive claims. The focus of attention is divided between the environmental aspect of our planet and the geological relief of our natural satellite from little-known angles.
On one hand, internet users compare records from 1972 with current photos to suggest a visible degradation of the Earth’s atmosphere. On the other hand, a supposed photograph of the “far side” of the Moon is circulating which, due to an unusual shape, has generated a wave of memes and collective surprise. Reports suggest that NASA has finally revealed what science has hidden for decades, sparking debates about what reflects reality and what is merely digital distortion.
Version 1: NOW!! NASA finally showed the back side of the Moon. The “far side” of the Moon… and the internet clearly wasn’t ready. Some things science reveals, and some things become a meme in 3 seconds. This image is proof that all it takes is a weird angle, a dirty mind, and there it is: another digital collective breakdown is born. Moral of the story: not everything astronomical needs to be taken so seriously… but you also can’t unsee it. Scientific reference: the far side of the Moon has been photographed since the Luna 3 mission in 1959, and later mapped in much more detail by missions like NASA’s Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO). (NASA Science) Did you see science… or did you see something else?
Version 2: NASA finally showed the “far side” of the Moon… and the internet clearly wasn’t ready. Some things science reveals, and some things become a meme in 3 seconds. This image is proof that all it takes is a weird angle, a dirty mind, and there it is: another digital collective breakdown is born. Moral of the story: not everything astronomical needs to be taken so seriously… but you also can’t unsee it. I was sent this on messaging apps saying it’s an Artemis photo showing the far side of the Moon, but it might be an edit…
Version 3: NASA RELEASES RARE IMAGE OF THE BACK OF THE MOON. NASA finally showed the “far side” of the Moon… and the internet clearly wasn’t ready. Some things science reveals, and some things become a meme in 3 seconds. This image is proof that all it takes is a weird angle, a dirty mind, and there it is: another digital collective breakdown is born. Moral of the story: not everything astronomical needs to be taken so seriously… but you also can’t unsee it. Scientific reference: the far side of the Moon has been photographed since the Luna 3 mission in 1959, and later mapped in much more detail by missions like NASA’s Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO). (NASA Science) Did you see science… or did you see something else?
Version 4: Look how incredible! At the top, the iconic photograph captured by the Apollo 8 mission, known as Earthrise, marked the first time humanity saw the Earth rise on the lunar horizon. In the midst of the space race, that blue and fragile vision suspended in the void was not just a technological feat, it was a shock of perspective. Through the lens of NASA astronauts, the planet ceased to be a divided territory to become a shared point.
Decades later, the Artemis II mission returns to this historical framing. The geometry is similar, but the context has changed: now, it’s not just about getting there, but also about understanding and preparing the next step of human presence beyond Earth. The contrast between the two images is not just in the lighting or definition. It’s in the intention. In 1968, it was discovery. In 2026, it is continuity. And yet, something remains constant: seen from the Moon, Earth remains silent, small, and incredibly alive, reminding us that, despite all the technology that took us there, it is this blue dot that still defines who we are.
Fact-Check
To clarify this digital confusion, we will answer the following points: 1) Do the photos show the far side of the moon with a curious shape and a more polluted Earth after 50 years? 2) Is there any real photo showing the far side of the Moon? 3) What explains the image that supposedly shows a more polluted Earth after 50 years?
Do photos show the far side of the moon with a curious shape and a more polluted Earth after 50 years?
No. After the Artemis II mission orbited the Moon in April 2026, these stories gained traction, but they mix scientific facts with erroneous interpretations and montages. Although the images comparing Earth from 1972 and 2026 are real, the conclusion that the color difference is due to pollution is false. As for the image of the Moon with a “buttock” shape, it is nothing more than a digital creation, possibly by artificial intelligence, which does not correspond to the satellite’s geographical reality.
Is there any real photo showing the far side of the Moon?
Yes, there are several, but none of them look like the “crude” montage that recently went viral. The far side of the Moon has been known to science since 1959, with the Luna 3 mission, and was mapped in detail by the LRO probe. More recently, the Artemis II mission itself recorded real images, as reported by technology outlets, which show the lunar surface in a way consistent with the geology we already know: full of craters and without the bizarre shape suggested by the rumor.
What explains the image that supposedly shows a more polluted Earth after 50 years?
The explanation lies in photographic technique and lighting, not pollution. The famous 1972 image, The Blue Marble, was taken with the Sun directly behind the Apollo 17 spacecraft, fully illuminating the Earth. Additionally, the use of analog film at the time tended to saturate colors. The 2026 photo, dubbed “Hello World,” was taken by Commander Reid Wiseman under different light conditions: the Earth was illuminated by reflected light from the Moon, with the Sun behind the planet, resulting in a more opaque appearance. As explained by specialized fact-checking sites, the differences are optical and atmospheric, not a direct visual indicator of accumulated pollution.
Conclusion
The posts circulating on the internet mix an AI montage about the Moon with a technically incorrect interpretation of real photos of Earth to create unnecessary alarm. The visual difference between the photos of our planet is due to the lighting and equipment used, while the curious image of the Moon is just a digital joke with no scientific basis.
Fake news ❌
Ps: This article was suggested by readers. If you want to suggest a topic for a fact-check, please contact our team via email or our official messaging channels.